The 10 Most Unanswered Questions about

What you Need to Know About the Ruling on Campaign Finance Law

It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. There is a good number of Americans whose interest is to see the part played by money in politics being put under control. It is for this reason that a good number of people have been patiently waiting for this ruling to see if corporates will be given the room to donate in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.

You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.

Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.

It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.

Featured post: additional resources